Direct Beam Comms #39

Star Trek: The Man Trap

TV

Star Trek – “The Man Trap” – Grade: A-

I had originally intended to write this review as if I were doing it from 1966 as a person who’d never seen Star Trek before and this first episode was my introduction to the series as it was to everyone back then. But it quickly became apparent that this is all but impossible today with 50 years of Star Trek AND sci-fi AND other TV series and movies that have “borrowed” from the series that all exist now beside the original so there’d be no real way to judge that first episode without comparing it to what’s come since.

latest“The Man Trap” was the first episode of Star Trek that aired back in 1966. However, when NBC originally aired the series they did so out of order so technically though “The Man Trap” was first it’s really the sixth episode of the show.

Here, the starship Enterprise under the command of Captain Kirk (William Shatner) arrives at planet “M–113” to give checkups to a group of scientists living there, one of which is an old flame of Doctor McCoy (DeForest Kelley). But when they arrive on this sun-scotched planet one of the crew-members is killed and the weird murders that leave red splotches all over the victims faces moves from the planet to the Enterprise. The crew quickly surmise that whatever’s doing the killings can shape-shift into looking like anything, meaning that ANYONE abroad the Enterprise might be the murderer.

I was surprised just how good “The Man Trap” was. My association with Star Trek the original series has always been a brief one. Over the years I’d try and watch it but for whatever reason could never get into the show and would bail after an episode or so. It didn’t help matters that when I was really into all things Star Trek in the 1990s the original series was airing exclusively on The Sci-Fi Channel which we didn’t get in my area so I never had a chance to watch the show then. And when episodes of Star Trek began re-airing on TV with new special effects* where I lived episodes aired at 11:30 at night which pre-DVR was a bit too late for me.

It doesn’t help matters that when I think of Star Trek for whatever reason I think of the later years ones of wild west gunfights and toga wearing Starfleet officers. So to say I was surprised at how good “The Man Trap” was is not an understatement.

Even 50 years later the story, abet for a few holes, stands up pretty well. The acting is top notch and the characters here are already well defined. Even if everyone has a tendency of spelling out things about each other out loud, which I suppose was handy for those who’d never seen the series before, but to me who knows just about everything about the show and its characters seemed a little wooden. But I really can’t hold things like that against the show.

I was surprised just how much “The Man Trap” played out like horror/sci-fi than just sci-fi like I was expecting. When the M–113 creature attacks it’s pretty disturbing. And the body count at the end of the show is like four crew members, all with those weird suction cup marks on their faces.

The cast too is much more diverse than I was expecting. Even by today’s standards with Uhura (Nichelle Nichols), Sulu (George Takei) and a multitude of background cast members of color Star Trek back in 1966 must have been really diverse.

I was also surprised just how deep the story goes — the creature of M–113 is described as the last of its kind, so there is an attempt at trying to save it even though it’s killed a lot of people. And we even get a bit of backstory of the character of Doctor McCoy showing that everyone, even those living in the 23rd century, have lives outside of Starfleet.

Looking back at the show, the depth of “The Man Trap” today is very surprising considering some of the series it was up against at the time including shows like My Three Sons, Bewitched, The Time Tunnel and Lost in Space to name a few. I’m not sure how shows like My Three Sons or The Time Tunnel have aged the last half century, but I’m guessing not as well as Star Trek has over those years.

*One thing of note — the episode I watched was one with many of the special effects like the Enterprise in orbit and planet M–113 from above that were redone about 10 years ago. I don’t feel like these new special effects changed the nature of the show but I kind’a wish there was still an option to watch the show originally as how it aired back in 1966. But I guess you can’t have everything.

The Night Of – Grade: B+

Okeowo-Riz-Ahmeds-Tragic-Transformation-The-Night-Of-1200What’s been billed as the series finale of the eight episode HBO limited-series The Night Of aired last Sunday and I was mostly happy with it. While the series might not be one of the great HBO shows ever, it was pretty good none-the-less.

The Night Of follows Nasir ‘Naz’ Khan (Riz Ahmed), a college student who’s arrested and charged with homicide after he awoke in a woman’s home to find her brutally murdered in the bedroom upstairs. Naz honestly can’t remember what happened that night and it’s up to his lawyers Jack Stone (John Turturro) and Chandra Kapoor (Amara Karan) to, not so much prove his innocence as to find flaws in the prosecution’s case and keep him out of prison for life. The prosecution, led by DA Helen Weiss (Jeannie Berlin) along with Detective Box (Bill Camp) follow all the leads they uncover with all point squarely at Naz as the killer.

But where The Night Of differs from procedural series like Law and Order is that I never got the sense that Weiss or Box were that personally involved in the case. They simply follow the evidence that seems to have collected around Naz. The problem in their approach, which I’d guess is a problem with real-life prosecutors like Weiss, is that she bends some of the evidence to point more towards Naz that it probably really does and in one case coaches a witness beforehand in the direction of his testimony without actually coaching him.

Which brings up a point — a lot of what we take as “evidence” is really subjective facts that can be bent in many different ways.

In jail awaiting trial Naz meets Freddy (Michael Kenneth Williams) a con who sees something in Naz and takes him under his wing. Unfortunately, under Freddy’s wing brings Naz to being an accomplice to a prison murder and smuggler of drugs. If Naz was clean on the outside, he’s dirty on the inside.

Which all builds the question — if the evidence that Weiss and Box are finding is strong but not absolute that Naz is guilty, but Naz turns out to be a guy who can watch someone else bleed to death in the prison showers, could be also be the guy who did commit the murder he’s accused of?

Think of The Night Of as equal parts Oz, The Wire and the network procedural lawyer show by way of The Wire. The series shows all parts of the criminal justice system where coming into contact with it can be something that ruin’s a life. Guilty or not, Naz pre-jail at the start of the series and where he ends up at the end finds him as a very different person.

And, much like in The Wire there’s a story thread that runs through The Night Of that goes something like those cops and lawyers who do the best and excel at their jobs are the ones who don’t care and are just going through the motions. And those who really care, like Stone or Kapoor, are left as wrecks by the end of the series.

I think if The Night Of had one problem is that while the story is told over the course of several months — the murder happens in November and Naz’s trial in February — it never felt like that much time was passing. Naz goes from college kid to hardened prisoner very quickly, a bit too quickly to be believable. Then again conditions at Riker’s Island where Naz is held are pretty deplorable, so I guess anything’s possible.

If this season of The Night Of is really it I think that would be a shame. I liked all the characters in it a lot and would like to see where everyone, especially the wonderful Bill Camp as Detective Box, ends up after the trial.

Movies

In the Heart of the Sea – Grade: A-

str2_daheartsea_scope_da-770x470I’m not sure what I was expecting from the movie In the Heart of the Sea, but what the movie actually was wasn’t what I thought it would be.

In the Heart of the Sea tells the story of the doomed crew of the 19th century whaling ship the Essex, them being attacked by a colossal whale which sank their ship and the surviving crewmen being set adrift in small whaling boats in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. The trailers for In the Heart of the Sea made the movie out to be the story of Moby Dick, of which the story of the Essex was an inspiration of. However, the actual parts leading up to the whale attack compromise just about half the movie. The other half of In the Heart of the Sea is about the men’s survival in the great “desert” of the Pacific where they slowly run out of food and water all the while being cooked alive by the relentless Sun.

Directed by Ron Howard who knows a thing or two about survival movies where a group of people are stranded and far from home without any prospects of rescue with the brilliant Apollo 13. In the Heart of the Sea plays out much like that earlier film but since it’s set in the late 1800s it means that when things go wrong the men of the Essex are on their own and can only count on their wits to get them back to Massachusetts.

I do wonder if the trailers for the movie had concentrated on this part of the story rather than the whale attack, which is only really minutes of screen time, if more people would’ve gone to see In the Heart of the Sea than they did since the film’s quite good?

My only quibble with it is of the casting of Chris Hemsworth as the lead of Owen Chase here. Hemsworth is fine in the movie but he usually plays heroic figures who you know will make the right decision and will still be around at the end of the movie. And I’m not sure that the character of Chase really needs to be played by one of today’s best action stars. It’s why Tom Hanks is so great in Apollo 13, he’s the last guy you’d suspect playing that role.

I would’ve much rather seen someone like Cillian Murphy, who co-stars in the movie, in the role of Chase and Hemsworth in Murphy’s role. I think that bit of casting against type would’ve made the good In the Heart of the Sea even better and more believable.

The Reading & Watch List

This week in pop-culture history

  • 1907: Fay Wray of King Kong and The Most Dangerous Game is born
  • 1966: Star Trek (The Original Series) premiers
  • 1966: The Time Tunnel debuts
  • 1973: The TV series Star Trek (The Animated Series) premiers
  • 1975: The animated series Return to the Planet of the Apes debuts
  • 1993: The TV series The X-Files premiers

The Second (Third?) Coming of Star Trek

I’ve found that it’s hard to come to terms with how popular some things are these days. When I was growing up the series Star Trek, which originally aired 50 years ago next month, wasn’t exactly popular. Where I lived, episodes of the original series aired weekdays before Little House on the Prairie and while there were Star Trek movies in theaters that did well enough at the box office to warrant a slew of sequels, I wouldn’t exactly have called Star Trek “cool” then.

tngcrewIn the 1980s, people who were into the series were derided as “Trekkies” and were considered to be nerds and losers because of their devotion to a series that had, at that time, been off the air for decades. And when new episodes of Star Trek returned to TV in 1987 with Star Trek: The Next Generation the series wasn’t considered good enough to air on a network and instead was shown in syndication. Which meant that the series was airing at different times and on different channels depending on where you lived. I remember TNG aired on a local non-affiliate station at the inviting hour of 9AM Sunday mornings which meant the series was basically filler since I can’t imagine Sunday morning makes for “appointment TV.”

For a moment in the mid–1990s just before TNG left the TV for feature films it felt like Star Trek was slightly cool — especially with two Star Trek series airing together then with TNG and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and then later a second TNG movie Star Trek: First Contact (1996) that was actually quite good.

leave_behind_476But it wasn’t too long before Star Trek would once again be relegated to the back of mind for most people as the quality of the feature films began to slip with the film series ending in 2002 and two more Star Trek series Star Trek: Voyager and Enterprise that never caught on with the general public or a majority of sci-fi fans.

All seemed lost for Star Trek until it was announced that a new movie was in the works by JJ Abrams who, at the time, was known as the guy who created the series Felicity and Alias, had a hand in the TV series Lost and had co-written and directed Mission: Impossible III (2006).

Abrams new movies would feature the original characters like Kirk and Spock from the first series but in all-new adventures and in an all-new and different universe that had a harder edge than before.

Being a Trekkie, I was super-excited about these new films and saw Star Trek (2009) the minute it was released and couldn’t have been more disappointed when I left the theater. Simply put, the story of the 2009 Star Trek had too many plot holes to count meaning there were large parts of that movie that simply did not make sense. I left the theater feeling dejected, thinking that this version of Star Trek would put the franchise on the back-burner again and we’d have to wait 10 years for new Star Trek.

latestBut that movie actually did quite well and another Star Trek movie, Star Trek: Into Darkness was released in 2013. Was that movie any good? I don’t know, you’ll have to tell me — I didn’t bother seeing it after the my disappointment of the first.

And the latest Abramsverse Star Trek movie, Star Trek Beyond, opened to a decent box office a few weeks back and was the number one movie in the US on its release. Still, if I ever end up seeing Beyond it’ll be because Simon Pegg, whom I greatly admire, had a hand in crafting the script and not because I’m a fan of the latest movie series.

But there has been a ray of hope in the Star Trek franchise of late — another TV series is in the works. This new Star Trek is being co-created by Bryan Fuller who most recently was responsible for the wonderful Hannibal TV series. Star Trek: Discovery is set to start airing January, 2017 but other than the first episode won’t actually be shown on TV, it’ll be the cornerstone of CBS’ $6 a month online streaming service.

Direct Beam Comms #24

TV

The Goldbergs, Fresh Off the Boat & black-ish

AJ Michalka and Troy Gentile of The Goldbergs
AJ Michalka and Troy Gentile of The Goldbergs

Last week, the ABC series The Goldbergs and black-ish ended their third and second seasons respectively while Fresh Off the Boat ends its second season this Tuesday. I enjoy watching these shows but honestly, I’m not sure I can point to one single moment last season from any of them that was memorable to me. That’s not criticism of these series since there are usually several times each episode that I literally LOL. But I’m not sure if it’s because there are so many episodes of TV here, between the three of them there’s 72, or if it’s because these shows are really like the lite-sitcoms of the 1980s, but there’s not a single moment in either The Goldbergs or black-ish or Fresh Off the Boat that sticks out to me.

To me, Fresh Off the Boat is an enjoyable show but is most like a 1980s sitcom with the characters being almost over-the-top and it being very heavy on the “situation.” And while I think that The Goldbergs and black-ish are better shows, to me The Goldbergs works best when the creators of that show find their own stories. But I get the sense that they’re being pushed to do more “event” style episodes like ones that pay homage to Dirty Dancing and Risky Business which are a bit contrived.

And while black-ish can, at times, be a much deeper show than either The Goldbergs or Fresh Off the Boat are, it can fall into the tropes that were popular in past sitcoms like the “very special” episode and “someone’s unexpectedly pregnant” that were staples of series past.

Grade: B for all

Robotech

Recently, Crackle began offering all 85 episodes of the classic animated series Robotech streaming via their service. Honestly I can’t remember the last time I watched Robotech from start to finish, but I plan to spend this summer filling some of my TV time catching up on this show that’s one of my favorite of all-time.

With the fall TV season slowly winding down and options for things to watch dwindling by the week, there’s a few new series I want to checkout in May.

Preacher Sunday, May 22 at 10PM (EST) on AMC

The cast of The Preacher
The cast of The Preacher

I hate to admit it, but I’m mostly ignorant on just what the Preacher comic and new AMC TV series is about. Checking out the marketing materials for the show and reading articles on it, Preacher seems to be a version of Hellblazer, except instead of a demonologist the main character is a priest who smokes, drinks and is otherwise self-destructive all while battling the unknown. That being said, having watched some of the promos for the show, Preacher seems to be less supernatural than I’d always assumed the comic was. Like the show really could just be about a hard-drinking preacher where, as it’s put several times in one promo, “anything can happen.”

Which is kind’a a bad thing. If the people involved in the show can’t properly describe what it’s about in a sentence or two, other than to say “anything can happen,” to me that doesn’t bode well for the show as a whole/moving forward. How can you create a compelling show if you’re not sure what it’s about?

DC Comics describes the comic series as:

After merging with a bizarre spiritual force called Genesis, Texan preacher Jesse Custer has become completely disillusioned with the beliefs to which he had dedicated his entire life. Now possessing the power of “the word,” an ability to make people do whatever he utters, Custer begins a violent and riotous journey across the country. Joined by his gun-toting girlfriend Tulip and the hard-drinking Irish vampire Cassidy, Custer loses faith in both God and man as he witnesses dark atrocities and improbable calamities during his exploration of America.

So who knows what the TV version will be about? Still, I’m interested enough in this one to check it out.

Wayward Pines Wednesday, May 25

The cast of Wayward Pines
The cast of Wayward Pines

The first season of this horror/sci-fi show about a small, isolated town in the Northwest US and all the weird goings-on there was interesting enough to me. It had some nice, unexpected, twists and turns and with the story of the first season being told in ten episodes start to finish felt about right. And now comes a new, second season with a new story and new lead actor. The first season featured Matt Dillion while the second has Jason Patric in a different story also set in Wayward Pines.

…the 10-episode, second season will pick up after the shocking events of Season One, with the residents of Wayward Pines battling against the iron-fisted rule of the First Generation.

Which, admittedly, doesn’t make much sense if you haven’t seen the first season of the show. But like I said, the creators of Wayward Pines took the series to some unexpected places and while the show wasn’t great, at times it was a fun one to watch.

Movies

Star Trek Beyond Trailer #2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzWIGFiGrlA

Everything is a Remix: The Force Awakens

On the Horizon

Currently, I’m working on articles about; animated films of the late 1970s and early 1980s, the movie Independence Day, the weird movies of 1986 and the movie Aliens which isn’t weird but is also from 1986. 😉

This week in pop-culture history

  • 1970: Beneath the Planet of the Apes debuts on screens.
  • 1979: Dawn of the Dead opens in theaters.

2016 Summer movie preview

First up this summer, as it has been the last eight years, is a Marvel movie; this time a third Captain America film with Captain America: Civil War on May 6. Really Marvel Movie XII, Civil War features most of the heroes of the Marvel universe splitting up and picking sides against one and other — one side for the superheroes having to register their real identities with the government and the other side against.

horsemenposter_1200_1778_81_sThe Nice Guys, out May 20, is the rare summer movie this year that’s not based on any previous work. Written and directed by Shane Black who also wrote and directed Iron Man 3 and the wonderful Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, The Nice Guys has a private eye and a mob goon, Ryan Gosling and Russell Crowe respectively, tooling around Los Angeles and getting into all sorts of Shane Black themed trouble.

The third movie of the recent X-Men movie series, but really the eighth in the overall franchise, is X-Men: Apocalypse out May 27. I’m a big fan of the most recent retro X-Men movies, the first taking place in the ’60s, the second in the ’70s and this latest one in the ‘90s with some of the characters from that decade I was realllllly into comics. My only concern here is that it seems like with Apocalypse the X-Team is fighting against an all powerful villain who threatens to enslave/destroy the human race. Which sounds a lot like Avengers: Age of Ultron from last summer to me.

WarCraft, based on the fantasy role playing game of the same name, is out June 10. Fantasy seems to be one of the hottest generas today with movies like The Hobbit and TV shows like Game of Thrones being fan-favorites. Except that there’s really nothing I’ve seen from WarCraft, which is admittedly not much, that makes it seem unique, or even all that different that what’s come before.

independence_day_resurgence20 years after the original comes a sequel to the sci-fi alien-invasion action film Independence Day with Independence Day Resurgence on June 24. Now I’ve got no problem with remakes, reboots or relaunches, but it does seem to me that at this point to make a sequel so long after the original is a decade or so too late.

A third Ghostbusters is out on July 15. What looks to be more of a remake/reboot of the original, this time around all of the Ghostbusters are played by women; Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones, and is being directed by Paul Feig who’s directed a ton of movies the last decade but will always be remembered by me and many others as being the creator of the highly influential Freaks and Geeks TV series.

A third Star Trek movie of the recent films Star Trek Beyond warps into theaters July 22. What’s interesting here is that this latest Star Trek adventure is co-written by geek-god Simon Pegg. What’s no so interesting here is that it’s being directed by Justin Lin who helmed three of the Fast & Furious flicks.

Suicide Squad posterMatt Damon returns to the Jason Bourne role he originated 14 years ago with the aptly titled Jason Bourne July 29. Damon skipped the last Bourne movie with Jeremy Renner filling in as a non-Jason Bourne lead. And I don’t think anyone would argue that Renner’s The Bourne Legacy was as good as what had come before. That’s why I’m excited about this new Bourne movie that brings back Damon and director Paul Greengrass that made two of the other previous films so great for Bourne’s latest outing.

If Marvel gets to open the summer movie season then DC’s gonna close it out with Suicide Squad on August 5. Feeling a lot like Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy, Suicide Squad pares a group of disparate, and so-far unpopular superheroes together to fight some greater evil. But with Suicide Squad instead of the superheroes being the good guys, they’re really bad guys like Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie), Deadshoot (Will Smith) and, no joke, Captain Boomerang (Jai Courtney). And while admittedly this might seem odd and strange, from what’s so far been released for the film Suicide Squad actually looks kind’a great.