Direct Beam Comms #43

TV

Luke Cage – First episode – Grade: B-

I’m a big fan of the Netflix Daredevil series but for whatever reason was never able to get into the Jessica Jones show and only ever watched a few episodes. But when a Luke Cage series was announced a while back as a sort’a spin-off to Jessica Jones I was intrigued enough to watch.

miiiistyHere’s the thing, the story of Luke Cage is so-so, but whenever the character of Luke Cage (Mike Colter) is on-screen it’s pretty great.

This third Marvel Netflix show follows the titular character who works days sweeping hair in a barbershop and nights washing dishes at a restaurant in order to get paid on the sly since he’s in hiding, from what is never quite clear. Cage was in prison and suffers nightmares from his time locked up and is now trying to turn his life around. Enter Cornell “Cottonmouth” Stokes (Mahershala Ali) the requisite bad guy in a really nice suit who’s working with elected official Mariah Stokes (Alfre Woodard) and is funneling ill-gotten gains into her campaign. But when one of Stokes’ deals goes bad he’s willing to do whatever it takes to get his merchandise and money back.

All of which is stuff we’ve seen before. It seems like in these superhero TV series the “bad guy in a really nice suit” has replaced the costume wearing villain as the main nemesis to the show’s title character. I’m not sure if it’s a budget thing where the series producers think they can’t afford showing things like CGI villains like Ultron or waves of Chitauri soldiers or if they just think that having costumed super villains is corny. But for whatever reason they keep going back to having the main baddy of the season be a powerful criminal boss. Which is fine, but it tends to get really old really fast. Even Daredevil, which has arguably the most famous bad guy in a really nice suit Kingpin, only did this in their first season. The second had Daredevil facing off against the likes of zombified ninjas!

marvel-luke-cage-mahershala-ali1So it is a bit of a disappointment to see much of the plot of Luke Cage trudging down that same well-worn path. Still, whenever the show’s about Luke Cage and not Cottonmouth’s criminal empire it’s pretty great.

This version of Luke Cage is this super-powerful guy who’s able to lift a washing machine like it’s nothing, take a punch in the face that ends up breaking the the hand of the person throwing it and even catch a bullet at one point. But at the same time he’s on the run not wanting to expose his identity and be found out and is even sensitive to boot.

But, with all these powers and a neighborhood that’s being overrun by Cottomouth’s goons it’s a shame that Cage isn’t able to do something about it which is pretty much where the first episode ends.

Looking back on the episode now, I think its main problem is that we spent as much time with the villains as Cage. And while I could see this being something that’s done later in the season I’m not sure it works here. Ali is great as Cottonmouth but I don’t think that character can carry a show as much as he’s given to carry it in the first episode here. Colter as Cage, on the other hand, I think can carry this show. I just hope in future episodes we spend a lot more time with Cage and not as much with the bad guys.

Movies

The Siege of Jadotville trailer

The Reading & Watch List

This week in pop-culture history

  • 1923: Charlton Heston of Planet of the Apes, Soylent Green and The Omega Man is born
  • 1949: Sigourney Weaver, Ripley in Alien, Galaxy Quest and Avatar is born
  • 1959: The TV series The Twilight Zone premiers
  • 1987: Near Dark opens in theaters
  • 1988: The movie Alien Nation premiers in theaters
  • 1999: The TV series Roswell premiers
  • 1999: The TV series Harsh Realm premiers
  • 2000: The TV series Dark Angel premiers

Direct Beam Comms #42

TV

The Exorcist – Grade: A-

To be honest, I’ve never seen the original 1973 film of The Exorcist. It was never one of those movies that turned up all that often “edited for TV” on the networks and for whatever reason I don’t ever remember seeing it on any of our pay cable channels we got either. Now I’m certain that I’ve seen parts and pieces of the movie over the years when I happened to catch it here and there. But I’m also very certain that I’ve never seen the movie from start to finish.

mv5bmtuznjg2odk5m15bml5banbnxkftztgwntiwotm3ote-_v1_sy1000_sx1500_al_And that may be why the new FOX The Exorcist TV series caught with me — I really don’t have anything else to compare it to.

This version of The Exorcist story takes place modern day in the same universe as the film — one of the priests of the show (Alfonso Herrera) sees a newspaper article mentioning the events of the film. In the TV version it’s Chicago and one of Angela Rance’s (Geena Davis) daughters has been behaving differently ever since the death of a friend. And ever since her daughter began behaving this way weird things have started happening around the house like voices inside the walls and weird shadows moving behind doors. Enter young Father Tomas Ortega (Herrera) who goes in and realizes he’s in over his head and isn’t even quite sure what’s happening and gets Father Marcus Keane (Ben Daniels) who has experience in exorcisms to help.

And that’s pretty much where the first episode ends, well after a pretty big/interesting twist to the TV version. So it seems like the story of the TV The Exorcist will be of these two fathers fighting for the soul of Rance’s daughter while at the same time finding out that there’s more than one demon involved.

I really got a kick out of The Exorcist — even if it does fall into the trap of having the demons only affecting people who are already religious which doesn’t quite make sense. Isn’t evil equal opportunity?

I went into it not expecting much — it doesn’t pay to expect much out of new TV series. But I left The Exorcist liking it a lot with the show giving off a strong The Sixth Sense and The Mothman Prophecies vibe in a good way. The show is creepy enough with a few genuine scenes of horror — even if there’s a few scenes where things happen that don’t quite make sense logically other than they happened that way in order to make the scene scarier.

I’m genuinely excited to see where this one goes — with one caveat. I think what worked so well here is that it seems like the story of The Exorcist is going to play out over the course of a season which is great. But only if that season is something like 10 or 13 episode. I think if FOX tries to turn the story of The Exorcist into something more/longer it’s not going to work.

But for right now The Exorcist looks to be the best new show of the season so far.

Also, I realized watching The Exorcist that this is Davis second foray in starring in a remake of a horror classic. She also starred in the 1986 movie remake of The Fly.

Star Wars Rebels – Grade: B+

Star Wars Rebels
Star Wars Rebels

This third, and reportedly final season of Star Wars Rebels on DisneyXD jumps ahead a few years in time from the first two seasons. Here, Ezra Bridger (Taylor Gray) has matured from a young boy to a young man, and where he once had burgeoning Jedi powers now wields these same powers as an almost master.

The only problem is that without the guiding hand of Jedi Kanan Jarrus (Freddie Prinze Jr.) Ezra is being lured by evil forces to serve the dark side.

The story complexity of Star Wars Rebels is surprisingly deep. This is much more than a simple action series where the good guys go and fight the bad guys. Instead, this is a show about what can happen to people fighting the good fight if they even take one step in the wrong direction. Like is Kanan’s decision to train Ezra as a Jedi which could possibly help bring down the Empire a good one, if it also means there’s a chance Ezra might instead be turned to bring down the Rebellion?

Now the rumor is that this is the final season of Star Wars Rebels since there’s a desire to rather than having a bridge show between the two film trilogies to instead have a new series focused on events around the new movies. Which is fine — it’s just a shame that Disney can’t find a few extra dollars in the billions that Star Wars is bringing in to support, I dunno, two Star Wars cartoons instead of just the one?

Just an idea. 😉

The Good Place – Grade: B

913084_770The premiere of the new show The Good Place debuted last week on NBC. It was billed as a comedy but after having watched the first three episodes that all ran last week I don’t think that The Good Place had many laughs — I think I chuckled a few times during the episodes. But what the show really is, is one of the darkest and most disturbing things on TV in the guise of a comedy which is actually kind’a interesting.

In The Good Place, Eleanor (Kristen Bell) is a newly deceased person who ends up in “the good place” where the good people go and not the “bad place” where everyone else ends up. Except it turns out that there was a mixup where Eleanor should’ve ended up in the bad place but instead wound up in the good place. And after Eleanor hears what it’s like in the bad place, which involves lots of screaming and loud noises, she wants to stay in the good place and enlists the help of her soul-mate Chidi Anagonye (William Jackson Harper) to stay. Which means he’s got to try and make her a better person.

Except that every time Eleanor has a bad thought or does something not good it makes bad things happen in the good place — like trash being strewn everywhere or giant ladybugs attacking the city. So it’s a question of can Chidi reform Eleanor before the good place is destroyed by her, or should he turn her into the good place overseer Michael (Ted Danson) and save everyone else?

Much of the comedy of The Good Place is supposed to come from Eleanor doing bad things like getting drunk, being selfish and envying others. And there are flashbacks to Eleanor when she was alive doing those same sort of things. However, what she did when she was alive wasn’t all that bad — she litters in front of an environmentalist and sneaks off to have sex with a bartender when she’s supposed to be her group’s designated driver. She’s not bad, she’s just a self-centered jerk.

And I think that’s where the darkness of The Good Place comes from. In the mythology of The Good Place only the best of the best get in. New arrivals watch an orientation film of why they made it to the good place and it’s obvious that the vast majority of people on the Earth aren’t good enough to make it to the good place and go to the bad place instead.

I think what interested me the most about The Good Place was thinking about just how people get picked to go into the good or bad place? It seems like there’s some algorithmic based decision going on there — doing good things adds up in your favor and bad takes away, but doing really good things adds up more than just slightly good and vice versa — but who made the algorithm and who made the good place? Is it god who’s pulling the strings?

In certain ways The Good Place reminds me of the 1980s The Twilight Zone episode “Dead Run”. In so much as in that episode it turns out that god isn’t the one deciding who goes to heaven and who goes to hell, that’s the devil’s job. And he’ll take anyone who’s even sinned in the slightest taking nice old grandmas who had impure thoughts and murders alike.

And The Good Place feels very much like the mirror of “Dead Run,” except here it’s the story of the lucky very few who avoid going to the bad place.

Honestly, if The Good Place were more of a drama I’d think it’s the next Lost wondering just what’s going on with the behind the scenes mechanics of the good place and the mystery of how and why everyone got there and what the bad place is like. Is the good place some lie? Are the people living in the good place not actually in the good place?

But since The Good Place is a comedy and not a drama I highly doubt this is the case. I’d be pleasantly surprised if there were something more hiding in the depths of the story of The Good Place, but I won’t be surprised whatsoever if there isn’t.

Lethal Weapon – Grade: C+

This new FOX series based on the 1987 Lethal Weapon film is basically Lethal Weapon-lite by way of the movie Last Action Hero where every police chase is a HIGH-OCTANE chase and every police shootout is a HIGH-OCTANE shootout. And, if a good character is going to be shot it’s going to be in their shoulder so they’ll be able to be up and around that same day. The bright shining spot of the mostly “we’ve seen this all before” Lethal Weapon is Damon Wayans as Roger Murtaugh who plays the role with just enough cheese to make the first episode at least watchable. Clayne Crawford as Martin Riggs, on the other hand, starts off the episode with a thick southern accent which he somehow looses after the first ten minutes. His version of the Riggs character seems to prowl the depths of depression one minute, pining over a dead wife and child while drinking shots and almost playing Russian Roulette, and almost joyous the next.

I get that the Riggs character is supposed to be a loose cannon and suicidal, but in tone I’m not sure that the TV version of Riggs is there yet.

MacGyver – Grade: F

I just threw up in my mouth a little.

Movies

Passengers movie trailer

The rom-com-space-con?

Cool Sites

Pilot Callsigns: The web’s largest collection of callsign stories

This week in pop-culture history

  • 1951: Linda Hamilton of Terminator, Terminator 2 and the TV series Beauty and the Beast is born
  • 1952: Christopher Reeve, Superman, is born
  • 1968: Night of the Living Dead opens in theaters
  • 1985: The TV series Amazing Stories debuts
  • 1987: Star Trek: The Next Generation premiers
  • 2001: Star Trek: Enterprise premiers
  • 2005: Serenity opens in theaters

Direct Beam Comms #41

TV

Son of Zorn – Grade: C

Alan_Zorn_Bird.JPGFox premiered their new Son of Zorn series last Sunday a few weeks early to coincide with the start of football. I wasn’t too excited about this one and was still underwhelmed after the first episode.

In Son of Zorn, Jason Sudeikis stars as the voice of He-Man-like cartoon character Zorn. But instead of being a kid’s TV series, Zorn comes from a real place where he occasionally visits his flesh and blood ex-wife Edie (Cheryl Hines) and their son Alan (Johnny Pemberton) in LA. Since Zorn’s been off fighting and killing these animated fantastical beasts on his island, he and his son have grown apart but Zorn wants to reconnect which means getting a job and moving to LA full-time.

I really hope there’s more to Son of Zorn than just deadbeat dad Zorn trying to make up with his son since not a lot of the universe the series takes place in makes much sense. Like, Zorn’s animated and everyone else is flesh and blood, yet no one ever makes mention of it. Which is all right, except as far as I can tell Zorn is the only animated being to live alongside us.

And Zorn was married to a real-woman and they had a kid, so that seems possible. Yet it’s never discussed how odd that is even though there’s never any other animated people around.

So are there other animated characters that live alongside people other than Zorn or is he unique? And if he’s unique wouldn’t that make him somewhat of a celebrity rather than someone who can only land a phone sales job because he meets their “diversity” quota?

Which could be overlooked if the series were trying to comment on something or, at the very least, made me chuckle once or twice. Except here there’s a one-note joke that Zorn is this fish out of water manly-man who can’t quite transition from his world to our own that’s played over and over and over again.

Son of Zorn feels a bit like the TV series Greg the Bunny that had puppets ala The Muppets rather than an 2D animated character. Except that while Greg the Bunny was actually funny and interesting, after one episode Son of Zorn so far is not.

Documentary Now season 2 – Grade: B+

960The hilarious IFC series Documentary Now starring Fred Armisen and Bill Hader returned for a second season last week and is great as ever. Each episode of the series is a parody of different, acclaimed real documentaries. The first episode of the second season was about two political strategists stealing the 1992 Ohio gubernatorial election in the style of the real 1992 documentary The War Room.

I love Documentary Now and even the few episodes that don’t quite work still can be very interesting. I honestly hope Armisen and Hader keep making new episodes of their series for years and years to come.

American Horror Story season 3 – Grade: B

ahs_childrenofthecorn_1200x1200The sixth season of the FX series American Horror Story debuted last week with “Roanoke.” I really enjoyed the first season of the show and liked the second one, but I thought the third was pretty dull and gave up on the show sometime in the fourth.

I think American Horror Story works best when it’s telling an gripping, twisting season long horror story with an unexpected ending. Which is exactly what the first season of the show did. But after that I think the filmmakers started concentrating more on trying to top themselves in terms of sex, gore and violence rather than trying something different from what they’d done before.

Which is why the sixth season of American Horror Story is so interesting looking — after one episode it seems like it’s different from what’s come before.

This time the show’s focus is on a married interracial couple Shelby and Matt played by Lily Rabe and André Holland who move to the woods of North Carolina looking for a simpler life after they were attacked on the streets of LA. But in true American Horror Story fashion, in North Carolina they find unwelcoming locals, a storm that rains teeth and some weird creature that stalks around their house at night leaving things like eviscerated pigs on their doorstep.

But the difference in the sixth season of the show compared to previous ones comes in just how the story’s being told.

Rather than telling a straight up story like in previous seasons, the sixth season is presented like some Discovery Channel horror show. Where the “real” Shelby and Matt give interviews documentary style in a studio while actors (Sarah Paulson and Cuba Gooding Jr.) playing Shelby and Matt reenact the stories they tell on screen in the studio.

I think the only problem I have with how these reenactments play out in the “Roanoke” show-within-a-show is that it appears as if they actually were filmed with some sort of budget, not the no-budged-no-frills-slightly-cheesy how most reenactment series end up looking these days. 😉

Star Wars Rebels season 3 TV spot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DD_9LAMJhaA

Punisher War Journal by Carl Potts & Jim Lee

detailOut now in a massive 504 page trade paperback is Punisher War Journal by Carl Potts & Jim Lee. This edition collects the first 19 issues of the Punisher War Journal classic series that defined a comics movement of the 1980s and 1990s.

Frank Castle doubles down on his war on crime courtesy of two of the finest creators ever to take on the character. If you’re a mob boss, hitman or hired goon, one day you’re gonna end up in Punisher’s War Journal. And it won’t be long before he crosses you off . As Frank continues his relentless mission, he’ll lock horns with old foe Daredevil, team up with Spider-Man, and meet a feisty new sparring partner – get ready for Punisher vs. Wolverine as only Jim Lee could draw it! “Acts of Vengeance” sees Frank take on new foe Bushwacker as Doctor Doom and Kingpin machinate behind the scenes. COLLECTING: PUNISHER WAR JOURNAL (1988) #1–19, MATERIAL FROM PUNISHER ANNUAL #2.

The Reading & Watch List

This week in pop-culture history

  • 1928: Adam West, Batman, is born
  • 1947: Stephen King is born
  • 1962: The TV series The Jetsons debuts
  • 1989: The TV series Alien Nation premiers
  • 1995: The TV series Space: Above and Beyond premiers
  • 2002: The TV series Firefly debuts
  • 2004: Shaun of the Dead opens in theaters
  • 2004: The TV series Lost premiers

Direct Beam Comms #40

TV

Atlanta – Grade: B

I’m not quite sure what to make of the new FX series Atlanta, co-written and starring Donald Glover of Community and The Martian. On the one hand, the series is beautifully shot and focuses on something I don’t know any series has focused on before. But I’m just not sure that the story’s there, yet.

In the first two episodes that aired back-to-back last week, we meet Earn Marks (Glover), a 20-something man who’s got a kid but no job and no prospects of one. He’s so down on his luck his parents won’t even let him in the house anymore because he’s always borrowing money. But when Earn learns that his estranged cousin Alfred “Paperboy” (Brian Tyree Henry) is an up and coming rapper with talent, Earn decides that managing Paperboy’s career might just be the thing to break him out of his rut.

Which when the characters were interacting was quite interesting. I think where Atlanta faltered was after the first episode the characters are split up after a shooting where Earn spends the episode in jail waiting to be processed which introduces a bunch of new characters to the story. But I was left wondering, am I supposed to be paying attention to these new characters, or should the focus be on Earn, Paperboy and friend Darius (Keith Stanfield)? It seems to me that if they wanted to separate the group like that, it would’ve probably been better to do a little later in the season. But in doing it in the second episode made me wonder just who was who and what was going on?

I can see Atlanta being one of those series that I like enough to watch a whole season of, but not one that ever totally catches on with me.

Narcos– Season 2, episode 1: Grade: B-

32The second season of the Netflix series Narcos became available last week. For whatever reason I got about three quarters of the way through the first season and stopped. I think I just had too many other series to watch at the same time so I “paused” watching Narcos but for whatever reason I’ve so far never gone back even though I’ve tried several times.

Narcos details with the rise of drug kingpin Pablo Escobar (Wagner Moura) who becomes a multimillionaire (billion?) by shipping cocaine from Columbia to the US and the rest of the world while also murdering anyone who gets in his way. Trying to bring Escobar down are the Columbian government and US DEA agents exemplified by Steve Murphy (Boyd Holbrook) and Javier Peña (Pedro Pascal). Whatever moves Pablo makes they try to check, but when Pablo’s organization is much better funded than either the DEA or Columbian government it makes it difficult, if not impossible, to even contain him let alone bring him to true justice.

Narcos isn’t a bad show, it’s just an extremely all right one. Like if they’d take the sex and nudity out of it I could see Narcos as playing as a summer series on NBC or ABC. Maybe with dubbed dialog rather than subtitles for the Spanish parts, but it wouldn’t take too much work to make Narcos work on network TV. And that’s nothing against summer network series that can be very entertaining at times. It’s just that in a world where there’s loads of TV choices many of which are golden and brilliant it’s a shame that Narcos isn’t much better than it is.

Movies

Silicon Cowboys trailer

The Reading & Watch List

This week in pop-culture history

  • 1936: Walter Koenig, Pavel Checkov of Star Trek the original series is born
  • 1958: The Blob premiers in theaters
  • 1963: The TV series The Outer Limits premiers
  • 1965: The TV series The Wild Wild West debuts
  • 1965: The TV series Lost in Space premiers
  • 1974: The TV series Planet of the Apes premiers
  • 1993: The TV series SeaQuest DSV premiers

Direct Beam Comms #39

Star Trek: The Man Trap

TV

Star Trek – “The Man Trap” – Grade: A-

I had originally intended to write this review as if I were doing it from 1966 as a person who’d never seen Star Trek before and this first episode was my introduction to the series as it was to everyone back then. But it quickly became apparent that this is all but impossible today with 50 years of Star Trek AND sci-fi AND other TV series and movies that have “borrowed” from the series that all exist now beside the original so there’d be no real way to judge that first episode without comparing it to what’s come since.

latest“The Man Trap” was the first episode of Star Trek that aired back in 1966. However, when NBC originally aired the series they did so out of order so technically though “The Man Trap” was first it’s really the sixth episode of the show.

Here, the starship Enterprise under the command of Captain Kirk (William Shatner) arrives at planet “M–113” to give checkups to a group of scientists living there, one of which is an old flame of Doctor McCoy (DeForest Kelley). But when they arrive on this sun-scotched planet one of the crew-members is killed and the weird murders that leave red splotches all over the victims faces moves from the planet to the Enterprise. The crew quickly surmise that whatever’s doing the killings can shape-shift into looking like anything, meaning that ANYONE abroad the Enterprise might be the murderer.

I was surprised just how good “The Man Trap” was. My association with Star Trek the original series has always been a brief one. Over the years I’d try and watch it but for whatever reason could never get into the show and would bail after an episode or so. It didn’t help matters that when I was really into all things Star Trek in the 1990s the original series was airing exclusively on The Sci-Fi Channel which we didn’t get in my area so I never had a chance to watch the show then. And when episodes of Star Trek began re-airing on TV with new special effects* where I lived episodes aired at 11:30 at night which pre-DVR was a bit too late for me.

It doesn’t help matters that when I think of Star Trek for whatever reason I think of the later years ones of wild west gunfights and toga wearing Starfleet officers. So to say I was surprised at how good “The Man Trap” was is not an understatement.

Even 50 years later the story, abet for a few holes, stands up pretty well. The acting is top notch and the characters here are already well defined. Even if everyone has a tendency of spelling out things about each other out loud, which I suppose was handy for those who’d never seen the series before, but to me who knows just about everything about the show and its characters seemed a little wooden. But I really can’t hold things like that against the show.

I was surprised just how much “The Man Trap” played out like horror/sci-fi than just sci-fi like I was expecting. When the M–113 creature attacks it’s pretty disturbing. And the body count at the end of the show is like four crew members, all with those weird suction cup marks on their faces.

The cast too is much more diverse than I was expecting. Even by today’s standards with Uhura (Nichelle Nichols), Sulu (George Takei) and a multitude of background cast members of color Star Trek back in 1966 must have been really diverse.

I was also surprised just how deep the story goes — the creature of M–113 is described as the last of its kind, so there is an attempt at trying to save it even though it’s killed a lot of people. And we even get a bit of backstory of the character of Doctor McCoy showing that everyone, even those living in the 23rd century, have lives outside of Starfleet.

Looking back at the show, the depth of “The Man Trap” today is very surprising considering some of the series it was up against at the time including shows like My Three Sons, Bewitched, The Time Tunnel and Lost in Space to name a few. I’m not sure how shows like My Three Sons or The Time Tunnel have aged the last half century, but I’m guessing not as well as Star Trek has over those years.

*One thing of note — the episode I watched was one with many of the special effects like the Enterprise in orbit and planet M–113 from above that were redone about 10 years ago. I don’t feel like these new special effects changed the nature of the show but I kind’a wish there was still an option to watch the show originally as how it aired back in 1966. But I guess you can’t have everything.

The Night Of – Grade: B+

Okeowo-Riz-Ahmeds-Tragic-Transformation-The-Night-Of-1200What’s been billed as the series finale of the eight episode HBO limited-series The Night Of aired last Sunday and I was mostly happy with it. While the series might not be one of the great HBO shows ever, it was pretty good none-the-less.

The Night Of follows Nasir ‘Naz’ Khan (Riz Ahmed), a college student who’s arrested and charged with homicide after he awoke in a woman’s home to find her brutally murdered in the bedroom upstairs. Naz honestly can’t remember what happened that night and it’s up to his lawyers Jack Stone (John Turturro) and Chandra Kapoor (Amara Karan) to, not so much prove his innocence as to find flaws in the prosecution’s case and keep him out of prison for life. The prosecution, led by DA Helen Weiss (Jeannie Berlin) along with Detective Box (Bill Camp) follow all the leads they uncover with all point squarely at Naz as the killer.

But where The Night Of differs from procedural series like Law and Order is that I never got the sense that Weiss or Box were that personally involved in the case. They simply follow the evidence that seems to have collected around Naz. The problem in their approach, which I’d guess is a problem with real-life prosecutors like Weiss, is that she bends some of the evidence to point more towards Naz that it probably really does and in one case coaches a witness beforehand in the direction of his testimony without actually coaching him.

Which brings up a point — a lot of what we take as “evidence” is really subjective facts that can be bent in many different ways.

In jail awaiting trial Naz meets Freddy (Michael Kenneth Williams) a con who sees something in Naz and takes him under his wing. Unfortunately, under Freddy’s wing brings Naz to being an accomplice to a prison murder and smuggler of drugs. If Naz was clean on the outside, he’s dirty on the inside.

Which all builds the question — if the evidence that Weiss and Box are finding is strong but not absolute that Naz is guilty, but Naz turns out to be a guy who can watch someone else bleed to death in the prison showers, could be also be the guy who did commit the murder he’s accused of?

Think of The Night Of as equal parts Oz, The Wire and the network procedural lawyer show by way of The Wire. The series shows all parts of the criminal justice system where coming into contact with it can be something that ruin’s a life. Guilty or not, Naz pre-jail at the start of the series and where he ends up at the end finds him as a very different person.

And, much like in The Wire there’s a story thread that runs through The Night Of that goes something like those cops and lawyers who do the best and excel at their jobs are the ones who don’t care and are just going through the motions. And those who really care, like Stone or Kapoor, are left as wrecks by the end of the series.

I think if The Night Of had one problem is that while the story is told over the course of several months — the murder happens in November and Naz’s trial in February — it never felt like that much time was passing. Naz goes from college kid to hardened prisoner very quickly, a bit too quickly to be believable. Then again conditions at Riker’s Island where Naz is held are pretty deplorable, so I guess anything’s possible.

If this season of The Night Of is really it I think that would be a shame. I liked all the characters in it a lot and would like to see where everyone, especially the wonderful Bill Camp as Detective Box, ends up after the trial.

Movies

In the Heart of the Sea – Grade: A-

str2_daheartsea_scope_da-770x470I’m not sure what I was expecting from the movie In the Heart of the Sea, but what the movie actually was wasn’t what I thought it would be.

In the Heart of the Sea tells the story of the doomed crew of the 19th century whaling ship the Essex, them being attacked by a colossal whale which sank their ship and the surviving crewmen being set adrift in small whaling boats in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. The trailers for In the Heart of the Sea made the movie out to be the story of Moby Dick, of which the story of the Essex was an inspiration of. However, the actual parts leading up to the whale attack compromise just about half the movie. The other half of In the Heart of the Sea is about the men’s survival in the great “desert” of the Pacific where they slowly run out of food and water all the while being cooked alive by the relentless Sun.

Directed by Ron Howard who knows a thing or two about survival movies where a group of people are stranded and far from home without any prospects of rescue with the brilliant Apollo 13. In the Heart of the Sea plays out much like that earlier film but since it’s set in the late 1800s it means that when things go wrong the men of the Essex are on their own and can only count on their wits to get them back to Massachusetts.

I do wonder if the trailers for the movie had concentrated on this part of the story rather than the whale attack, which is only really minutes of screen time, if more people would’ve gone to see In the Heart of the Sea than they did since the film’s quite good?

My only quibble with it is of the casting of Chris Hemsworth as the lead of Owen Chase here. Hemsworth is fine in the movie but he usually plays heroic figures who you know will make the right decision and will still be around at the end of the movie. And I’m not sure that the character of Chase really needs to be played by one of today’s best action stars. It’s why Tom Hanks is so great in Apollo 13, he’s the last guy you’d suspect playing that role.

I would’ve much rather seen someone like Cillian Murphy, who co-stars in the movie, in the role of Chase and Hemsworth in Murphy’s role. I think that bit of casting against type would’ve made the good In the Heart of the Sea even better and more believable.

The Reading & Watch List

This week in pop-culture history

  • 1907: Fay Wray of King Kong and The Most Dangerous Game is born
  • 1966: Star Trek (The Original Series) premiers
  • 1966: The Time Tunnel debuts
  • 1973: The TV series Star Trek (The Animated Series) premiers
  • 1975: The animated series Return to the Planet of the Apes debuts
  • 1993: The TV series The X-Files premiers