Nav
Survive Mars
Mission to Mars
 
M2M
articles
images
 

What's New? Mission to Mars

 

Your voice counts (atleast it should)

After you see the movie MISSION TO MARS, write a review and have it posted here, at SURVIVE MARS. You can write just about anything you want. The review can be as short as "It sucks" or a thousand word essay on the merits of the movie. Send me your reviews today.


Michael Summer's review

Before you do anything else, read this review. Michael seems to have a way of summarizing a movie down to it's very essence. You're eye's will thank you. 3.30.00

>> Read his review

Bert's review

I just got home from seeing the movie M2M. I hate to say this but I really enjoyed the movie. I'm working on a full review that will be up shortly.


 

I couldn't agree more, Bert. 3.18.00

I kept waiting to be bored; but I never was. The biggest problem with this movie is that it is not "Independence Day," and it requires more than a 1st grade level of comprehension. I went to see Independence Day twice; and it sucked twice. I am going to see this movie again because it was a good movie. kevin c. guice

The most well written review 3.15.00

It is a bit difficult (and unfair, in my humble opinion) to criticize a movie without giving away details, but here goes...

I would not say it was *absolutely* horrible, yet it was quite bad. In general, summarize it as a collection of ripped off ideas from good examples of the genre like 2001, Apollo 13, and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, etc., combined with an uncommon compliance with physical laws and technical details, yet exercised badly through mediocre or worse acting and a substandard plot. There are a few subtle throwbacks to even Star Trek.

It is refreshing to see that they had instances where they utilized technical limitations well to create challenging, suspenseful scenes--but they wasted them either through bad acting (or overacting), plot points left hanging or led astray, cheesy commentary (and I mean, *cheesy*).

The only enjoyable parts were, I have to say, some death scenes (watch for an excellent mutilation scene towards the beginning of the movie; and no, I am not insane or anything--just an interesting idea to put on film), a lot of out-of-place but hence *very funny* jokes (I am certain some were not meant to be jokes, even), and a few good examples of CGI (ships, etc.--nothing organic).

The plot is barely there, hanging by threads. The characters are shallow--the beginning scenes were promising, but they were given no chance to develop (cf. Apollo 13); the moral--if there is one-- is simply "stated" by one of the secondary characters and comes across so cheesy, you just laugh it off. A good philosophical argument about the origin of life on Earth, if any, was botched by revealing too much, too late and suddenly, without any subtlety or cliffhangers. Made me feel like, "OK, the movie's over, let's go home." (cf. 2001 which makes you think _years_ if not _hours_ afterwards. But, of course, that _was_ Kubrick).

Brian de Palma should go back to making gangster movies.

A brilliant Tim Robbins was wasted in this movie with stupid dialogue and a character not given enough depth to explore. He seems to make excellent movies with inspiring roles (Hudsucker Proxy, Shawshank Redemption), interspersed with stupid, insufficient, forgettable roles (IQ, this movie)--something I often see equally (if not more) brilliant Robin Williams do as well.

Same goes for Gary Sinise who is a skillful actor; a beautiful Kim Delaney appears merely in photos and a few seconds of recaps--hope she got paid well.

Jerry O'Connell was as bad as usual and ignorable in his role.

I am sincerely sad to say that this movie could have been a greater success as a comedy; it would in fact be better than Mars Attacks!. Frankly, I am glad I do not have to pay $7.xx for it in a theater.

As for the product placement, don't even get me started...

Why can Hollywood not make a technically consistent movie with a _toned_ suspension of disbelief when needed (to help the art part of the deal), yet at the same time is a solid, good story, with believable (notice I do not necessarily say "likeable") characters, a consistent plot, and some meaning? It is either the former or the latter. It is as if the two don't go together. But then, there is the classic Star Wars and the recent Babylon 5 series. (Oops, that is *technically* TV. But they did shoot it in widescreen to be released at a later date; well, that's another article).

My $0.02. Regards, Kerem

Damn %$#@*&^ good review! 3.15.00

I didn't see it, but one of my friends from MIT who did see it sent me an amusing review...unfortunately it's not appropriate for a family mailing list....

The general consensus was that it was pretty bad, unfortunately. I just hope people who see it don't start confusing the science fiction from the movie with the science fact of potential missions. Jim

Gimme MORE!!! 3.15.00

Mission to mars, a film about the first man landing on mars is a good film but lacks something.
the opening scene is that of a barbecue party, we meet the guys and get some story line, then blam, we see explore luke on mars. Great shot, but i wanted to see the mars lander land! the flag planted! the first steps This is the pace of the film, you are suddenly transported months into the future.

Also, the ships are a 'bute! but how the hell do they work? theirs a gravity generator in the space station, and one onboard the ship. But how does the ship land on the planet, and were is all the cool gear stored? these are things i wanna see!!

then theirs a part with REMO, some type of mars satellite, but what does it do? does it store extra gear, can it survive entering the mars atmosphere? we aren't told! Well, the rescue team gets to mars, minus a man due to a truly brave act.

They find luke, and theirs this one line in the film " so when you got to the mountain, a FORCE came at you LUKE" an intentional star wars joke? maybe.

Well, the end is cool!!!

we see how life came to earth and leave the film being friends with the aliens, who might really be closer to humans then u think. in closing mission to mars is action packed, with some gut turning deaths, filled with special effects, and a great story on a scale from 1 to 10, 1 being mortal combat 2 and ten being titanic, i give m2m an 7. i hope they release a special edition to see the cut scenes. LOCOMAN

Great to look at with the sound off. 3.14.00

Okay, here's my review.

Special effects were amazing, awesome. You could honestly believe you were seeing the surface of Mars. Other than that, great big holes - like wouldn't they have spare NAV boards that wouldn't have got fried because - they were spares - and not under power.

The acting was very one dimensional. You have the juxtaposition of an astronaut getting his limbs ripped off in a sand cyclone and then the original mars leader saying "thanks for saving my life, man".

The sound score sucked - what weird music.

The audience coming out of the theatre I attended was strangely subdued - maybe because of the hypnotic music, the fact that an alien was portrayed as beneficent and benign, or the excess of cheese in this movie.

I expected much more in the acting department - and, that sound score, really, really sucked. Lara Arnott

>> More Reviews  

 

 

Survive Mars.com is copyright © 1999, 2000 Bert Ehrmann
all other contents copyright © their respective owners

Dangerous Universe